Lithuanian and Belarusian national narratives. G. B. Vico’s «retrospective»

Authors

  • Р. Камунтавічус Vytautas Magnus University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18524/2304-1439.2017.2(29).119952

Keywords:

G. B. Vico, historical narratives, Belarus, Lithuania

Abstract

National narratives are subjective, one-sided and conflicting. This problem has been noticed among European thinkers since the 19th c. An Italian thinker G. B. Vico has no direct relation to the modern problem of national narratives or to Lithuanian or Belarusian historical interpretations. But he appeared to be one of the most influential thinkers of modern times who made an extraordinary impact on humanities of the 20th c. Vico formulated three stages of evolution of peoples: epoch of the Gods, period of heroes, and age of people. The same stages are essentially repeated in the structure of national narratives of the 20th and even of the 21st c. This is long-standing mental paradigms that have remained unchanged for hundreds of years. They can be traced in Belarusian and Lithuanian histories as well. Two national narratives have been engaged in many decades lasting conflict being unable to share heroes of the common past, especially of the 13–15th c., such as Mindaugas, Gediminas, Algirdas, and Vytautas. Vico concludes that subjectivity is unavoidable in the narrations composed by humans. Contradictory interpretations of the common past created by Belarusians and Lithuanians are more natural than the creation of one «perfectly true» vision of the past.

Author Biography

Р. Камунтавічус, Vytautas Magnus University

Kamuntavičius R.

References

Anderson, B. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London, New York: Verso, 2006.

Ankersmith, F. R. Narrative Logic: A Semantic Analysis of the Historian’s Language. Hague, 1983.

Berger, S. «History and National Identity: Why they should remain divorced.» History and Policy (2007), 66.

Berger, S., and Ch. Lorenz, eds. Nationalizing the Past. Historians as Nation Builders in Modern Europe. Palgrave, 2010.

Berlin, I. Vico and Herder. Two Studies in the History of Ideas. London, 1976.

Bloch, M. The Historian’s Craft. New York: Vintage Books, 1953.

Bull, M. Inventing Faleshood, Making Truth: Vico and Neapolitan Painting. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.

Carretero, M., C. Lopez, M. F. Gonzбlez, and M. Rodrнguez-Moneo. «Students Historical Narratives and Concepts about the Nation.» In History Education and the Construction of National Identities, 154. IAP, 2012.

Iriye, A. «The Internationalization of History.» American Historical Review 94(1) (1996), 1–10.

Kamuntavičius, R. «Formation of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania according to Lithuanians and Belarusians,» in A Book of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. Towards the Traditions of European Community. A Joint Publication of Scientists and Writers from Belarus, Lithuania and Poland, 28–45. Sejny, 2008.

Le Goff, J. History and Memory. Columbia University Press, 1992.

Nietzsche, F. The Gay Science. New York, 1974.

Renan, E. «Qu’est-ce qu’une nation?» Paper presented at the conference, Sorbonne, Paris, March 11, 1882.

Roshwald, A. The Endurance of Nationalism: Ancient Roots and Modern Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Upton, A. F. «History and National Identity: Some Finish Examples» in National History and Identity: Approaches to the Writing of National History in the North-East Baltic Region. Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Helsinki, 1999.

Vico, G. B. New Science. Penguin Classics, 2001.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-28

Issue

Section

UKRAINE AND WORLD. INTERNATIONAL MEASURING OF TRANSFORMATION PROCESSES