Features of usage of the index of social justice in ukrainian realities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18524/2304-1439.2016.3(26).118842Keywords:
social justice, concepts of social justice, social indexes, society, European Union, UkraineAbstract
In this article the author reviews the essence of social justice within the framework of sociological discourse. The importance of the social justice is outlined since it stands out for determining reform activities and social policy of the state as a social superstructure. The author states four basic concepts of social justice (egalitarian, utilitarian, Rawls concept and the market concepts) and analyzes each of them in the context of their possible use in Ukraine. The main focus of the article is on the Social Justice index, as newly invented social indices, which has been developed in the European Union and is updated annually by institutions of EU. The comparative analysis of countries’ rankings in terms of social justice for 2014 and 2015 uncover changes that are discusses in the paper. It is noted that with every year the gap between the successful Nordic countries and those countries of the southern EU part that are still in the post-crisis phase is increasing. However, at the same time, in most countries of the EU the social justice index stays on the acceptable and a high level over the past years, and this level does not have the tendency to a deterioration. The author also examines possibilities of applying the Social Justice Index, and indices that compile it, in Ukraine. Ukraine is also analyzed in frame of the Index of Human Development of the United Nations, as another example of social indexes.
References
Alekseeva T. A. «Dzhon Rouls i ego teoriya spravedlivosti.» [John Rawls and his theory of justice] Voprosy filosofii 10 (1994): 26–37.
Gulevich O. A. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya spravedlivosti: Biznes, politika, yurisprudentsiya: [monografiya]. [Social psychology of justice: business, politic, jurisprudence: [monography] Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2008.
Darendorf R. Tropy utopii: Rabota po teorii i istorii sotsiologii. [Trails of Utopia: Work on the theory and history of sociology], Moskow: Praksis, 2002.
Sagradova A. A., ed. Indeksy chelovecheskogo razvitiya: Problemy i perspektivy. [Indexes of human development: problems and perspectives] Collection of papers. Moscow: MAKS press, 2002.
Kudin V. Strategiya obrazovaniya i sotsial’naya spravedlivost’: issledovanie. [Strategy of education and social justice: research paper]. Kyiv: Zolot³ Vorota, 2010.
Kuchuradi I. «Spravedlivost’ — sotsial’naya i global’naya.» [Justice: social and global] Voprosy filosofii 9 (2003): 17–30.
L’vov D. S. «Spravedlivost’ i dukhovnyi mir cheloveka.» [Justice and spiritual world of human] «Zavtra», 12.04.2007.
Perelygin I. A. Problema mnogoobraziya kriteriev sotsial’noi spravedlivosti: Filosofskometodologicheskii analiz [The problem of diversity of criteria of social justice: philosophicalmethodological analysis] Kharkiv: Osnova, 1995.
Petrosyan D. «Sotsial’naya spravedlivost’ v ekonomicheskikh otnosheniyakh: institutsional’nye aspekty.» [Social justice within economic relations: institutional aspects] Voprosy ekonomiki, 2 (2007): 59–67.
Moskvyn D. D., ed. Problemy sotsial’noi spravedlivosti v zerkale sovremennoi ekonomicheskoi teorii [Problems of social justice within contemporary economic theory] Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2002.
Rouls Dzh. Teoriya spravedlivosti [Theory of justice] Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk University publishing, 1995.
Rubel’ V. A. ²stor³ya seredn’ov³chnogo Skhodu [History of Medieval East] Kyiv: Lib³d’, 2002.
Kheffe O. Spravedlivost’: filos. Vvedenie [Justice: philosophical introduction] Moscow: Praksis, 2007.
Cherepanov V. D. «Sotsial’naya spravedlivost’ — kategoriya politicheskaya.» [Social justice is a political category] II Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, Seriya 12 «Politicheskie nauki», 3 (2005): 34–40.
Shapkin A. E. Sotsial’naya spravedlivost’ i svoboda rynka. Versiya XX. [Social justice and the freedom of market. Version XX] Saint-Petersburg: SZPI, 2000.
Guseinov A. A., ed. Eticheskaya mysl’: nauchno-publitsisticheskie chteniya [Ethical thought: scientific-publicistic works] Moscow: Politizdat, 1990.
Yarkova E. N. «Utilitarizm kak stimul samoorganizatsii kul’tury i obshchestva.» [Utilitarianism as an incentive to self-organization of culture and society] Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 2 (2002): 88–101.
Boulding, Ê. Social Justice in Social Dynamics. Edited by R. Brandt. N-Y, 1962.
HDRO (Human Development Report Office) United Nations Development Programme / Human Development Report 2015 «Sustaining Human Progress: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Building Resilience». — http://hdr.undp.org/en/2015-report.
Rawls J. «Justice as fairness: Political not metaphysical.» Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 14 (1985): 228–230.
Sauer W. Gerechtigkeit D. Wesen Und Bedeutung Lebender Menschen Und Völker. Berlin, 1959.
Schraad-Tischler D., Kroll Ch. Social Justice in the EU — A Cross-national Comparison. Germany: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2014.
Schraad-Tischler D. Social Justice in the EU — IndexReport. Germany: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Odesa National University Herald. Sociology and Politics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Правовласниками опублікованого матеріалу являються авторський колектив та засновник журналу на умовах, що визначаються видавничою угодою, що укладається між редакційною колегією та авторами публікацій. Ніяка частина опублікованого матеріалу не може бути відтворена без попереднього повідомлення та дозволу автора.
Публікація праць в Журналі здійснюється на некомерційній основі.
Після публікації автор має право опублікувати свою роботу в будь-якому іншому засобі масової інформації без дозволу редакції журналу, без посилання на журнал, але з повідомленням редакційної колегії журналу про публікацію своєї роботи в іншому засобі масової інформації.
Редакція має право віддати роботу автора на публікацію до іншого засобу масової інформації, але з дозволу автору.