LOBBYING OF SEPARATIST’ INTERESTS AS ONE OF DISTRACTIVE MECHANISMS OF SOCIO-POLITICAL PROCESSES

Authors

  • І. Є. Ворчакова Mykolayiv National University of V. A. Sukhomlinskyi, Ukraine
  • В. М. Лісовський Mykolayiv National University of V. A. Sukhomlinskyi,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18524/2304-1439.2016.2(25).78176

Keywords:

separatism, lobbying, lobbying of interests of the separatist, the separatist movement federalization.

Abstract

In this article a debatable question of positive and negative role of separatism
in modern political processe is raising. The risks and threats to the lobbying of this phenomenon in Ukraine is showing. The role and mechanisms of intervention of one state in the territorial disputes of other countries and the consequences of the impact is analyzing. Discusses the ambivalent position of scientists regarding the positive and negative aspects of the manifestations of separatism. The level of influence of foreign elites on the development of separatist manifestations on the territory of another state was analyzed. At the same time it is proved that the lobbying of the most powerful regional elite separatist ideas can lead to socio-political destabilization in the state and the military armed conflict. It argues that lobbying by certain political forces in
the creation of a Federal state in Ukraine is nothing but the result of the incitement of separatist sentiments. The views of scientists on the prospects of development of military events in our state was analyzed. The ways of solving the separatist conflict in Ukraine is proposing.

References

Espiell, Gros H. Pravo na samoopredelenie. Niu-York: Izd-vo OON, 1980.

Divak V. Separatyzm yak fenomen suchasnoi polityky. Politologichni ta pravovi aspekty. Kyiv: Logos, 2010.

Zalizniak L. «Oberezhno: federalizacija!» Accessed February 20, 2016. http://www.volfoto.inf.ua/pagesi/istomist/statti/2014rik/dm140501/t140506/oberezh/oberezh.htm.

Karmazina M. «Gromadianska identychnist v Ukraini v konteksti zovnishno-politychnyh vidnosyn.» In Politychni mehanizmy formuvannia gromadianskoi identychnosti v suchasnomu ukrainskomu suspilstvi, 258–286. Kyiv: IPiEND im. I. F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy, 2014.

Kliuchnyk R. «Separatyzm yak svitova megatendencija suchasnosti.» Politychnyi menedzhment 6 (2011): 120–127.

Kresina I. «Protydiia separatyzmu v Ukraini: pravova baza.» Paper presented at the foreign scientific and practical conference ’Pravova polityka v Ukraini: pytannia teorii ta praktyky’, Kyiv, October 24, 2014.

Lysenko L. «Proiavy teroryzmu ta separatyzmu na shodi Ukrainy: analiz osnovnyh prychyn.» Paper presented at the 3rd Ukrainian scientific conference ’Naukovyi dialog ’Shid-Zahid’, Kamianets-Podilskyi, June 7, 2014.

Romaniuk N. «Separatyzm yak suspilno-politychne yavyshche suchasnosti.» Paper presented at the 1st foreign scientific and practical internet-conference ’Aktualni problemy krainoznavchoi nauky, Lutsk, October 9–10, 2014.

Sydorenko M. «Suchasnyi lobizm: vydy ta metody.» Paper presented at the foreign scientific conference ’Dni nauky filosofskoho fakultetu — 2015’, Kyiv, April 21–22, 2015.

Sinovets P. «Rol Rossii v ukrainskom krizise 2014 goda: analiz i perspektivy sderzhivaniia.» Visnik ONU im. I. I. Mechnikova. Sociolohiia i politychni nauky 19, no. 2 (2014): 63–72.

Stepyko M. «Potentsialni zagrozy regionalnogo separatyzmu v Ukraini.»Accessed February 20, 2016. http://www.niss.gov.ua/articles/1478/

Tanchuk N. «Regionalna polityka Ukrainy v konteksti derzhavotvorchogo rozvytku ta socialnogo zahystu.» PhD diss., Nacionalnyi pedagogichnyi universytet imeni M. P. Dragomanova, 2011.

Hobsbaum E. Natsii i natsionalizm posle 1780 goda. SPb.: Aleteiia, 1998.

Brusylovska I. «Russian-ukrainian conflict. First stage war.» Visnik ONU im. I. I. Mechnikova. Sociolohiia i politychni nauky 20, no. 2 (2015): 59–63.

Spenser M. Separatism: democracy and disintegration. Boston: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998.

Published

2016-09-23

Issue

Section

POLITICAL SCIENCES. POLITICAL PROCESSES AND SOCIAL STATE