The controversies of Ukrainian lustration

Authors

  • Н. Мінєнкова National University of «Kyiv-Mohyla Akademy», Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18524/2304-1439.2017.2(29).119964

Keywords:

lustration, transformation, «transitional justice», transitological paradigm, Central-Eastern Europe

Abstract

The political analysis of lustration in Ukraine as an institutional practice of public administration has been made in the article.

Lustration is defined as personnel policy, which involves the exclusion of certain categories of persons from the system of public administration for a certain time. According to the model, the lustration in Ukraine is a «severe» administrative ban (10-year suspensions) and a «judicial ban» (5-year suspensions). The uniqueness of Ukrainian lustration is in the possibility of including in the system of public administration persons who are subject to the lustration requirements, subject to receiving them the status of participants in the Antiterrorist operation.

The Ukrainian lustration is a «late», by time, so-called «lustration of the second wave».

The expanded object of lustration is applicable to three categories of persons:

1) those who were involved in the usurpation of power in the time of V. Yanukovych;

2) persons who worked in the Communist Party leadership positions in the Komsomol were secret servants of special services; 3) workers who could not prove the legal, noncorrupt nature of their property acquired while they stay at the governmental posts.

The advanced lustration facility in Ukraine (the inclusion of the first category

1) of the people who held positions under the presidency of V. Yanukovich and the third) corrupted corresponds to the practice of late lustration in the CEE countries, in particular, such restrictions were in force in Bulgaria, Romania, for «Successful capitalists «or» «Lending millionaires».

In 2014–2017 was the third attempt to introduce lustration in Ukraine, as it was noted in the article. The initiative belonged to the public, and it arose even during the events of the Revolution of Dignity.

The beginning of the institutionalization process (adoption of the Law «On the Purge of Power», the creation of the lustrous register) was the result of the joint activities of public and state leaders.

Summing up, it has been proved that the lustration in Ukraine is a political process, the necessity of which is determined by the need for the self-defense of a democratic state in the process of transformational change. Ukrainian lustration practice causes a lot of social discussions, conflicts of interest in political elites, but, in general, it promotes the consolidation of democracy in the country.

Author Biography

Н. Мінєнкова, National University of «Kyiv-Mohyla Akademy»

Minenkova N.

References

Minenkova, N. «Lustracja jak naukova problema suczasnych zarubiznych ta vitchyznianych doslidzhen» [Lustration as the scientific problem of the modern foreign and domestic research]. European political and political and law discourse. 3–4 (2016): 90–98 (in Ukrainian).

Minyenkova, N. «Do py’tannya lyustracij v krayinax Central’no-Sxidnoyi Yevropy» [The issue of lustration in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe]. Gileya: naukovy’j visny’k: Zbirny’k naukovy’x pracz’. 101 (2015): 489–492 (in Ukrainian).

ZU «Pro ochyshchennya vlady». http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1682–18.

David, R. Lustration laws in action: The motives and evaluation of lustration policy in the Czech Republic and Poland (1989–2001). 28(2) (2003): 387–439.

Devid, R. Lyustratsiya v Ukrayini ta yevropeys’ki standarty: formuvannya demokratiyi spromozhnoyi sebe zakhystyty [Lustration in Ukraine and European standards: the formation of a democracy capable of self-defense]. http://www.fair.org.ua/content/library_doc/FAIR_Report_ Roman_David_Lust_and_Democ_2015_UKR.pdf. (in Ukrainian).

Matsiyevs’kyy Yu. U pasttsi hibrydnosti: zygzagy transformatsiy politychnoho rezhymu v Ukrayini (1991–2014). [The trap of hybridity: zigzag transformation of the political regime in Ukraine (1991–2014)]. Chernivtsi: Knyhy XXI, 2016. (in Ukrainian).

Yedynyy derzhavnyy reyestr osib, shchodo yakykh zastosovano polozhennya Zakonu Ukrayiny «Pro ochyshchennya vlady». http://lustration.minjust.gov.ua/register.

Reyestr osib, shcho pidlyahayut’ lyustratsiyi. http://registry.lku.org.ua/dashboard.

Final’nyy analitychnyy zvit za rezul’tatamy monitorinhu v ramkakh proektu «Rozbudova spromozhnosti hromads’kykh orhanizatsiy ta zdiysnennya monitorinhu protsesiv perevirky ta lyustratsiyi ta informatsiyno-prosvitnyts’ka kampaniya z pytan’ perevirky ta lyustratsiyi derzhavnykh sluzhbovtsiv ta suddiv». http://cvu.org.ua.

Vseukrayins’ke opytuvannya hromadyan shchodo demokratychnykh zmin u politychnykh ta suspil’nykh sferakh, sudovoyi reformy ta protsesu ochyshchennya vlady v Ukrayini. http:// www.fair.org.ua/content/library_doc/FAIR_LustrSurvey_Summary_2016_ UKR.pdf.

Published

2017-12-28

Issue

Section

UKRAINE AND WORLD. INTERNATIONAL MEASURING OF TRANSFORMATION PROCESSES